
.avif)
California’s SB 54 packaging EPR program is moving toward its first major compliance cycle. Producers must submit:
California is operating under “interim rules,” with final regulations expected in 2026. This makes 2026 a pivotal year for producer compliance, data accuracy, and budgeting.
California’s early-fee structure is unique: 2026 fees are based on 2025 data (not 2024 like OR/CO).
California follows the standard EPR producer hierarchy:
Most consumer-facing brands will be directly obligated.
California’s SB54 regulation covers:
Check if you are liable in California using our Free tool here.
California requires:
You can learn more in this detailed guide for California EPR here.
Source reduction is one of the core pillars of California’s SB54 system, and beginning in 2026 every producer will be required to submit an Individual Source Reduction Plan outlining how they will meaningfully reduce the amount of packaging they introduce into the state. In addition, California requires an Annual Source Reduction Report to track supply data and source reduction activity.
California has defined five approved source reduction pathways, including reuse or refill models, material elimination, material substitution, concentrating or shifting to bulk format, and alternative compliance (use of PCR). Producers will need to quantify 2023 data baselines, set reduction targets aligned with the state’s 2032 goals, and demonstrate credible pathways for implementation.
CAA has published a reporting workbook and detailed guidance to help producers report in compliance with SB54 requirements.
For a deeper explanation of how source reduction works and what it means for producers, read our blog post on CA Source Reduction.
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) fees fund recycling, collection, and infrastructure improvements at a state level. Therefore, California bases its fees on its own circular economy roadmap and existing infrastructure.
Starting in 2026, producers selling into California must report detailed packaging data and pay annual fees based on their material footprints. California applies a per-kilogram fee rate by material category and adjusts it with eco-modulation (bonuses or penalties for design choices). You can learn more in this detailed step-by-step guide for California EPR here.
California is the only EPR state using 2025 data to generate early fee invoices in 2026. Note that early fees are only “pre-program fees” to start-up the program in California. Producer final fees (beginning 2027) will be higher than the early fees since they would include total program cost and not just start-up cost.
California will implement a robust eco-modulation system, including:
Early fees will be invoiced in August 2026.
These differences make California the most operationally complex state for 2026.
rePurpose Global’s Packaging Sustainability & Compliance Platform supports:
✔ Component & Sub-Component Mapping
Essential for California’s stricter reporting.
✔ Auto-Mapping to CA Material Categories
Including plastics-by-resin, fiber grades, metals, composites.
✔ One-Click Export of All 2026 CA Reports
Baseline, Producer Supply Report, Source Reduction Plan and more.
✔ Source Reduction Planning
Strategize how to achieve source reduction targets using the approved pathways.
✔ State-Level Sales Allocation
If you do not have exact California sell-through data, rePurpose creates compliant estimation models.
✔ Fee Simulation for 2027 Early Fees
We use 2025 data to forecast likely August 2026 invoices.
✔ Harmonization Across All States
Single dataset → mapped into CA, OR, CO, WA, MN, MD, ME.
August 2026, based on CY 2025 data.
Yes — every producer must submit one. Exact timing TBD.
Yes. Packaging must be broken down to the component and often sub-component level for plastics.
Yes — the CAA portal remains open for late submissions.
It requires more granular reporting, includes early-fee structures, and mandates individualized source reduction plans.



